Allenbycimbex Archibald & Rasnitsyn 2023, n. gen.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Allenbycimbex n. gen. http://zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 704AB0FB-18D0-4CF4-AB78-F48D42378EAF Fig. 4. Type species. Allenbycimbex morrisae n. sp. Diagnosis. Distinguished from Cenocimbex by R lacking dark triangular sclerite before base of pterostigma reaching 1-Rs+M near 1m-cu; wing narrower (length/width ca. 3.0 as reconstructed) [Cenocimbex: 2.5]; cell 3rm long (2rm to 3r-m distinctly longer than length of 3r-m); hind wing with m-cu placed much basally than in Cenocimbex; distinguished from Leptostigma by pterostigma broad, maximum height distinctly exceeding height of C to R basal to pterostigma. Locality and age. Vermilion Bluffs Member of the Allenby Formation south of the village of Princeton, British Columbia, Canada; mid-Ypresian. Species included. Type only. Etymology. Named for the Allenby Formation, where its only specimen was found. The name is to be treated with masculine grammatical gender since it is derived from Cimbex (see Taeger et al. 2010: 188).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".