Excavations at Brampton, Huntingdonshire, 1966
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TL 204713. A complex of cropmarks on Ouse gravels was examined, although results were limited by developers requirements that trenches should not exceed 18in depth, and the soil was too acid to preserve bone or metal. Of several presumed barrow-circles (the first cemetery of this type known in the county) the most complex proved to have begun as a stake-circle barrow (Ashbee type B2), with a fine maritime type beaker, amber bead and flint blade in a pit. The area was surrounded by an outer ditch. Later, a new ditch was dug, related to the burial of a primary series urn containing a cremation and the tip of an arrowhead. Several other pits could not be examined. The beaker provides surprising evidence for early settlement of Dutch Beaker people in the Ouse valley and a reminder of early littoral settlements now lost by drowning of the coastline. The rectangular Iron Age enclosure contained two small (c 22ft diameter) huts, other less determinate structures and a little pottery of Belgic type. A pit alignment and a metalled road were also located.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".