MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6932027246 · doi:10.5284/1102960

Historic Building Recording of the Long Island Exchange Hotel, Victoria Close, Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire, WD3 4EQ

2014· article· en· W6932027246 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Science Research and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetropolitan areaAccommodationQuarter (Canadian coin)Block (permutation group theory)Plan (archaeology)PermissionPublic transportCity block

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The building recording was carried out in accordance with an English Heritage Level 2 survey and in response to a planning condition on planning permission 14/0945/FUL and 13/2277/FUL. The historic building survey has revealed that the hotel was first built as a pair of Victorian dwellings, named Douglas Villas, during the late 1870s to mid 1880s. Following the arrival of the Metropolitan railway line in 1887, which provided a direct overland link to London Baker Street and Marylebone Stations from Rickmansworth, the villas were re-modelled as the Victoria Hotel to take commercial advantage of its close proximity to the new railway and station. This adaptation occurred during 1887-1888, and is marked by issuing of a licence to sell alcohol in 1888, following the rescinding of a licence from the nearby Sugar Loaves public house. The remodelling of the former villas also entailed their enlargement with the addition of a new two storey billiard hall and accommodation block to the rear of the villas and the construction of larger outbuildings, including stabling and a coach house to accommodate road travellers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score0.563

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0930.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicPolitical Science Research and EducationFrench-language works237,207