MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6932057197 · doi:10.5683/sp3/5iedao

Replication Data for: Synthetic Indoor Ecosystem

2023· dataset· en· W6932057197 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal and reproductive studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersOntario Centres of Excellence
KeywordsAbiotic componentEcosystemProductivityZooplanktonPeriphytonAlgal bloomBiomass (ecology)PlanktonBiotic component

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proof of concept project tested whether it is possible to construct a stable and productive modular synthetic ecosystem for indoor or limited outdoor spaces. The design relied on four modules: green waste digester, algal culture, zooplankton culture, and fish. We measured several biotic and abiotic variables to assess the stability and productivity of the components. We include the following temporal series data: Chlorophyll a, Daphnia population, dissolved oxygen, duckweed density, ecosystem productivity, pH, and vegetable waste additions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1440.093

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealisSame topicHormonal and reproductive studiesFrench-language works237,207