MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6935981753 · doi:10.57962/regionalia-18489

Wer kennt „Neu-Deutschland"?

2022· article· de· W6935981753 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRegionaliaOpen · 2022
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCentral European national history
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrder (exchange)State (computer science)Context (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gesucht wird mit der Frage „Wer kennt ,Neu-Deutschland"' keine Zeitung oder eine Bezeichnung für die Bundesrepublik nach 1989, sondern ein Ort irgendwo in Kanada, wo ein Ferdinand Siefert leben sollte. Eine Frage, vor der der Beamte des „Großherzoglichen Ministeriums des Großherzoglichen Hauses und der auswärtigen Angelegenheiten" im Juli 1868 kapitulierte, als er einem Offenburger Notar mitteilen musste ,, ... daß nach den hier vorliegenden Ortsverzeichnissen eine Stadt ,Neu-Deutschland' in Canada nicht existiert." Der Teilzettel mit der Berechnung des Erbteils für Ferdinand Siefert blieb in der Akte in Karlsruhe, das Erbe in Baden.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.419
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it