Secondary ice processes: Results from seven airborne field campaigns
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<!--!introduction!--><b></b> The secondary ice process (SIP) in cumulus clouds is a major microphysical process, which can result in rapid enhancement of ice particle concentration in the presence of pre-existing ice. We present results of airborne investigations of Cumulus Congestus clouds (CuCg) from seven field campaigns spanning the time period from 2011 – 2022: ICE-T, SEAC<sup>4</sup>RS, UAEREP (2), CAMP<sup>2</sup>Ex, SPICULE and ESCAPE. The SPEC Learjet research aircraft participated in all of the field projects accompanied by other research aircraft in five of the seven projects. The results presented are a synthesis of measurements of marine and continental CuCg from the Caribbean, Southeast U.S., South China Sea, UAE and U.S. High Plains. The composite data indicate that after the first primary ice typically formed at temperatures colder than about -8°C, subsequent production of ice via the fractured frozen drop (FFD) SIP was strongly related to the concentration of supercooled large drops (SLDs), with diameters from about 0.2 mm to a few mm. The concentration of SLDs is directly linked to the rate of collision-coalescence, which in turn depends primarily on the subcloud aerosol size distribution and cloud base temperature. Once the production of small ice is initiated via the FFD SIP, the differential in fall velocities between small ice and SLDs creates an avalanche process that rapidly freezes the supercooled region of an updraft core. Other SIP mechanisms, Hallett-Mossop and ice-ice collisions, are also considered. These studies provide the framework for a consistent picture of FFD SIP parameterization in weather prediction models. <br>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".