The Canadian Paper Industry and Its Growth: Its Present Position and Its Future
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rapid rise to prominence of the Canadian paper industry has given Canada a remarkable advantage during a period in which upset economic conditions have brought many countries to the very brink of bankruptcy. But expansion in Canada's paper industry has absorbed business slack. It has created new wealth, a large part of which has ready demand in export markets. It has provided the incentive for power development and the extension of transportation, and it has contributed greatly to the progress of settlement. In short, paper manufacture has kept Canada profitably busy during a period of world-wide adjustment.But even a miracle industry may not be permanent. The tremendous importance of the paper industry to Canada's welfare, its interrelation with other industries and its place in the economic structure not only of Canada but of the British Empire demands the utmost permanency. The utilization of products of vast areas of land which otherwise might be barren, the conversion of the resources from these lands into export commodities of high value, and the extension of industry and settlement into otherwise undeveloped regions can not depend upon an ephemeral industry. Paper manufacture is the backbone of these movements at the present time, and their whole future course depends to a large extent upon continued expansion of that industry to the very limit of its resources and the subsequent maintenance of that expansion.Is Canada's paper industry permanent? Any answer to this question involves analysis of the factors underlying the place of the industry in national economy, its present position in foreign and domestic markets, and its present stability, as a measure of future permanency. The question of adequate pulpwood supplies in the future is of vital importance. Are Canada's present available pulpwood supplies sufficient to support current growth of the industry? Will they tide the industry over the transition from virgin to second growth timber? Can Canada grow enough pulpwood to meet the mill requirements which have been set up? Can these requirements be grown in competition with other countries? These and many other questions deserve careful analysis as a basis for private and public policy.These are among the more important, questions underlying the permanency of the Canadian pulp and paper industry. It is impossible to discuss adequately all phases of these questions in a paper of this nature. Particular attention will be devoted, therefore, to the problem of pulpwood supplies of the future. Other questions will be discussed chiefly as they may relate to the question of pulpwood supplies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".