MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6936433315 · doi:10.58079/ou8w

Journées de statistiques, Ottawa

2008· article· fr· W6936433315 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPickering emulsions and particle stabilization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Work (physics)Context (archaeology)Agency (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Je serais aux Journées de Statistiques, a Ottawa, avec au programme un exposé sur Tails of Archimedean copulas. Un répertoire complet et convivial des queues de copules est présenté. Il peut être utilisé pour la sélection et la construction de modèles appropriés avec les propriétés voulues. Les résultats sont synthétisés sous forme d’arbre de décision : compte tenu des valeurs de certaines caractéristiques du générateur archimédien, chacune des queues inférieures et supérieures de la copule e...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.499
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.012
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicPickering emulsions and particle stabilizationFrench-language works237,207