MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6936446097 · doi:10.58079/o3fo

Recherche en éducation : de la veille au dialogue

2006· article· fr· W6936446097 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicEducational Assessment and Improvement
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Government (linguistics)Field (mathematics)Process (computing)Identification (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En Suisse comme au Canada, la veille en éducation est fortement plébiscitée par les institutions. L'Institut de recherche et de documentation pédagogique (IRDP, Neuchâtel) et le Service de la recherche en éducation (SRED, Genève) ont participé au numéro spécial de la revue "L'éducateur", paru en mars dernier : "La recherche en éducation". On retiendra l'article de Vanessa Wirth de l'IRDP : "Utilité de la veille dans la recherche en éducation". C'est preuve à l'appui (enquête auprès des enseig...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.656
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.013
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicEducational Assessment and ImprovementFrench-language works237,207