MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6936560804 · doi:10.58079/mtb3

AUTOUR DU FESTIVAL INTERNATIONAL DU FILM D’HISTOIRE DE MONTRÉAL

2019· article· fr· W6936560804 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory, Culture, and Diplomacy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Perspective (graphical)NarrativeField (mathematics)Tourism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

C'est avec plaisir que je partage ici les premières lignes de l'article que je viens de publier dans la revue Hors Champ à propos du premier Festival du film d'histoire de Montréal. Le premier Festival international du film d’histoire de Montréal (FIFHM), qui s’est tenu à la Cinémathèque québécoise du 3 au 5 mai 2019, s’est ouvert par une séance ayant pour thème : La pellicule, témoin de l’histoire. Le programme est intrigant, car il laisse présager un intérêt pour le passé – dont le support...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.550
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.011
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1130.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicHistory, Culture, and DiplomacyFrench-language works237,207