MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6936651108 · doi:10.58079/sybi

Proust à l'écran | Cinémathèque | Montréal | avril 2017

2017· article· fr· W6936651108 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Literature and Critical Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSet (abstract data type)Perspective (graphical)Subject (documents)Focus (optics)Interpretation (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cinémathèque québécoise335, De Maisonneuve Blvd East Montréal, Québec, H2X 1K1 From April, 09th 2017 to April, 10th 2017 Proust à l'écran L’adaptation de l’oeuvre maîtresse de Marcel Proust au cinéma constitue un défi qui a donné lieu à la création d’œuvres étonnantes, parfois hors normes. L’adage selon lequel l’adaptation constitue une forme de trahison, n’a peut-être jamais eu autant de pertinence qu’avec Proust. Ce cycle rassemble quatre films, partagés entre les adaptations littérales (A...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.643
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.029
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicFrench Literature and Critical TheoryFrench-language works237,207