MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6936729088 · doi:10.58079/tc6i

Les églises tétraconques dans l’Antiquité tardive

2022· article· fr· W6936729088 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Religious Studies of Rome
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiseaseAction (physics)Identification (biology)Context (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Date. Lundi 28 et Mardi 29 novembre 2022 Lieu. Rome (et en distanciel) Organisé par Dominic MOREAU, Irina ACHIM et Gabriele CASTIGLIA, en collaboration avec l’École française de Rome, l’Accademia di Romania in Roma et le Pontificio Istituto di Archeologia Cristiana, avec le soutien du projet DANUBIUS (Agence nationale de la recherche), du réseau international de recherche HAEMUS (programme Internationalisation de l’Université de Lille) et de l’Université du Québec à Rimouski (Conseil de reche...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.573
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0100.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0720.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicHistorical and Religious Studies of RomeFrench-language works237,207