L’acculturation du droit français dans les anciennes colonies d’Amérique (Québec, Haïti, Louisiane)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’existence de codes civils, et parfois de traditions civilistes, dans les sociétés postcoloniales en terres d’Amérique, est plus que symbolique sur les plans politique, culturel et même linguistique. La fin du XVIIIe siècle au Québec, et le début du XIXe siècle en Haïti et en Louisiane, marquent une période de flottement entre, d’une part, la tradition civiliste (Québec) ou la codification (Haïti, Louisiane) et, d’autre part, l’influence du droit de common law anglais (Québec) ou américain (Louisiane). Le droit civil français est globalement envisagé de manière favorable pour régir la société dans les anciennes colonies d’outre-Atlantique. C’est aussi, dans une certaine mesure, le droit public français qui sert de modèle (à travers l’adoption de différentes constitutions en Haïti) ou d’inspiration sur afin d’éclairer des questions précises (par exemple, la distinction entre citoyenneté et nationalité en Louisiane et en Haïti).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".