MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6936771529 · doi:10.58079/p30d

Sobre a Nova Recomendação da UNESCO sobre Museus Colecções sua Diversidade e Função Social (X)

2016· article· pt· W6936771529 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2016
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMuseums and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Field (mathematics)Diversity (politics)Indigenous

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Questões relevantes para a Teoria Museológica Depois da análise mais detalhada da inovação da nova Recomendação da UNESCO, vale a pena olhar agora para o que ela significa no campo da Teoria Museológica. De um modo geral podemos referir que esta recomendação consagra a emergência duma disciplina científica. Já acima nos referimos que os documentos estruturantes da Museologia Social, em particular os que estiveram em cima da mesa na Reunião do Quebec em 1984. Uma herança que nasce da relação ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.488
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0110.016
Scholarly communication0.0130.006
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicMuseums and Cultural HeritageFrench-language works237,207