MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6936799955 · doi:10.58079/oxox

Appel à contribution: Genre et âge.

2015· article· fr· W6936799955 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSet (abstract data type)Subject (documents)Context (archaeology)Action (physics)Perspective (graphical)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

APPEL À TEXTES Âges de vie, genre et temporalités sociales Parution prévue automne 2016 Rédacteurs invités Aline Charles, Université Laval (Canada) David Troyansky, CUNY, Brooklyn College (États-Unis) Remise des propositions (résumés) : 16 mars 2015 Les résumés (1500 à 2000 caractères, espace compris) doivent être soumis en ligne : efg.inrs.ca Remise des manuscrits complets : 14 septembre 2015 Longtemps menées en parallèle, les études sur les âges de vie et sur le genre convergent davan...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.581
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.014
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207