MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comprehensive evaluation approach of regional management for oil and gas stations and its application

2024· article· en· W6936813667 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess (computing)Integrity managementPetroleum industryIdentification (biology)Control (management)Pipeline transportReliability (semiconductor)Risk management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective With the continuous evolution of pipeline technologies, the regional management mode has emerged as an inevitable choice for the development of the long-distance oil and gas pipeline industry. To further advance regional management of oil and gas stations, enhancing risk control capabilities and delineating the advantages and disadvantages at various management levels during this transition process becomes imperative. Methods This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation system of regional management for oil and gas stations, utilizing the Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) within the process industry sphere. This approach integrates multiple evaluation techniques like expert scoring and hierarchical analysis, focusing on centralized monitoring, control, and maintenance to enhance risk management and control capabilities within operational zones. Results The proposed comprehensive evaluation system of regional management was applied to 10 typical oil and gas stations, leading to the effective identification of deficiencies in multiple aspects, including technical foundations, management systems, and staff competencies in operations and maintenance. These shortcomings were categorized into 31 specific concerns across 9 categories. The specific setbacks include the following: (1) The technical conditions for centralized control and monitoring, and reliability assessment fall short of requirements after the transformation of these oil and gas stations. (2) Some management regulations necessitate improvements, particularly those related to dispatching offices and operation areas, as well as maintenance teams in terms of their responsibilities, centralized patrol inspection, and maintenance. The enforcement and implementation of these documents need to be further reinforced. (3) Working staff capabilities at these oil and gas stations require improvement, and labor organization structures need further optimization. Conclusion The comprehensive evaluation of regional management assisted these oil and gas stations in uncovering shortcomings, identifying gaps, devising solutions, strengthening foundations, and fostering improvements. The evaluation outcomes provided them with systematic guidance and technical support in a unified, quantifiable, and graded manner, facilitating further progress in regional management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score0.462

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.245
GPT teacher head0.515
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it