MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6936949300 · doi:10.58079/szz5

La marchandisation de l'éducation, le clientélisme universitaire et leurs contraires: pistes de réflexion

2020· article· fr· W6936949300 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Educational Policies and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Field (mathematics)Set (abstract data type)Order (exchange)Identification (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au cours de l'affaire récente entourant l'utilisation du mot en N en contexte universitaire et le sort réservé à Mme Verushka Lieutenant-Duval, beaucoup de professeur.e.s, tout spécialement dans les domaines des sciences humaines et des lettres, ont tenu à exprimer une certaine craintes qu'iels éprouvaient face à un certain clientélisme dans les actions de l'Université d'Ottawa. Personnellement, je me suis déjà exprimé.e sur l'enjeu du racisme (spécifiquement en lien avec la production de E...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.842
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.008
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicGlobal Educational Policies and ReformsFrench-language works237,207