MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6939192380 · doi:10.60692/6yy9f-75323

The preparation in the direction of learning in a multigrade group in students of the Bachelor of Primary Education

2023· article· en· W6939192380 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGreater South Information System · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBusiness, Education, Mathematics Research
Canadian institutionsEducation and Early Childhood Development
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBachelorCurriculumPlan (archaeology)Group (periodic table)Subject (documents)Group workPrimary education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of the article is to provide a content system structured in a program that modifies the study plan incorporating the subject "Work in multigrades", which is located in the Own Curriculum of the 3rd year of the Bachelor of Primary Education career, its methodological orientations, as well as actions to be developed in the groups of years, disciplines and subjects for the preparation of teachers.Definitions and principles are systematized, extracted from research by other Cuban authors, themes are grouped according to the characteristics of the teaching practice, which are: multigrade group or unitary school, work variants in a multigrade group, methodological preparation for multigrade, the plan of single class, the control and evaluation of learning in a multigrade group and the direction of learning in a multigrade group is defined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.205

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it