LLNL 3D Protein-Ligand Dataset for Anti-viral Screening against SARS-CoV-2. In Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Open Data Initiative
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dataset contains protein-ligand complexes in a 3D representation for anti-viral drug screening against SARS-CoV-2. This is a part of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Covid-19 Therapeutic Design database, but is specifically designed to facilitate machine learning and other data science tasks with regard to both efficacy (protein-ligand binding affinity) and safety. This complex dataset is called "ml-hdf", comprised of ligands and four potential binding pockets of the SARS-CoV-2 protein targets in a 3D atomic representation. The ligands in this dataset includes Federal Drug Administration (FDA) approved drugs and "Other-world-approved" drugs that have been approved for use by the EU, Canada and Japan. The compounds were docked against two binding pockets from the Spike protein (spike, spike1) and two conformations of the main protease (protease, protease2).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.024 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".