MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Hydration Caves in the Site of Weathering Anhydrite-Gypsum Rocks at Dingwall (Nova Scotia, Canada)

2021· other· en· W6939278786 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCaveWeatheringKarstGypsumWall rockCarboniferousGroup (periodic table)Pennsylvanian

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the less known processes responsible for the formation of caves is gypsification or hydration of anhydrite. This process, according to reaction: CaSO4 + 2H2O = CaSO4∙2H2O, can lead to a volume increase of the rock and is the reason for generation of numerous deformations. In the weathering zone local detachment and uplift of the surface layer of the rock are one of the most common. The detached layer rises up and creates peculiar hydration forms of relief. They include dome-shaped forms, tepee-shaped forms (showing triangular outline in cross-section) and elongated ridges. All of them have a height up to more than 2 m and dimensions in a plan view up to several or several dozen meters. A rock void is created under the elevated rock layer. To the largest voids or chambers an adult person can enter, when their minimum size is about 0.30 m [1, p. 3]. Such voids represent hydration caves (Quellungshöhlen in German) – a very rare type of caves recognized only in a few places around the world. The most numerous group of caves occurs in the abandoned Carboniferous gypsum quarry at Dingwall (in Canadian Nova Scotia), studied by the Authors. At the bottom of the quarry, 77 hydration dome- and tepee-shaped forms have been documented, and nearly forty caves and rock shelters have been identified in theirs interiors. The length of the rock voids ranges from 0.7 to 8.87 m. Their maximum height ranges from 0.28 to 1.35 m. The thickness of the elevated rock layers ranges from 0.06 to 0.46 m and generally is thinner in the central part of the forms. Hydration caves evolve in shape and size. Degree of destruction depends on the thickness of the uplifted rock layer, fractures and amount of anhydrite transformed into gypsum. The formation of caves depends on the rate of anhydrite weathering and the type of quarry bedrock. Three types of bedrock: the bedrock with a open joint system, the bedrock with apparent layering and the homogeneous and massive bedrock without distinct lithological and structural features, have a different effect on the hydration forms and hydration caves occurring inside them. The structure of bedrock for example influence the way the rock void is opened and fractured. The cave bottom is commonly a solid fractured rock and covered with blocks detached from the ceiling or with weathered rubble. The cave ceiling is a solid rock showing smooth morphology, in places with protruding bent pieces of rock and with fractures. Caves entrances are predominantly from one site of hydration form. Rarely there are two entrances or small inlets that are too narrow for a man to enter the cave. Some documented caves are worth to remark: the longest and simultaneously the highest cave (Ramesh Cave) with an axis length of 8.87 m and a height of 1.35 m; the largest cave according to size of the bottom surface (Damian Cave) with an area of 29.4 m2; and two-chamber cave (Adrian Cave); and the others: the divided cave; the tepee-shaped cave; the rock bridge cave; as well as the symmetrical and asymmetrical caves. Hydration caves are a unique and rarely described type of caves. Their documentation and detailed characteristics bring us closer to recognition the way of their development and morphological evolution. In turn, the inventory, monitoring and promotion enable general public to learn about them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.200

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→French-language works237,207→