Circumscription and typification of sphagnicolous omphalinoid species of Arrhenia (Hygrophoraceae) in Newfoundland and Labrador: three obligate and one facultative species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Molecular studies of sphagnicolous arrhenias in Newfoundland and Labrador created four clades in Arrhenia , three obligate sphagnophiles (two scaly-capped and one smooth-capped) and one facultative (smooth-capped). Nomenclatural review recovered 16 names applied to omphalinoid sphagnicolous taxa in the past. Critical review of these left five as suitable to this group. One scaly obligate sphagnophilic clade contained the type for Arr. gerardiana and the other the type for Clitocybe gerardiana var. fusca ; the latter we introduce as the novel species Arr. bigelowii . It differed from the first by longer spores and a darkening reaction in 10% of collections. The smooth-capped third obligate sphagnophilic clade contained the types of Ag. telmatiaeus and Omphalina fusconigra ; we recombined it as Arr. telmatiaea . This is the darkest species of the group, with a more northern distribution. The facultative sphagnophile was identified as Arr. philonotis , a lighter smooth-capped species also with a more northern distribution. In addition, we collected an unidentified smooth-capped facultatively sphagnophilic species of Omphalina of the O. pyxidata complex. All five species are distributed in both Europe and North America. We describe each species of Arrhenia with a sequenced type, providing new type material where needed, and add an informal description of the Omphalina . Overall, this study adds new sequences from 82 specimens of sphagnicolous arrhenias to the two existing in GenBank when we began, 11 new sequences of the unidentified species of Omphalina , and several other arrhenias.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".