MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6939485383 · doi:10.60692/m3tpq-rkv35

Measurement of the Azimuthal Angle Dependence of Inclusive Jet Yields inPb+PbCollisions atsNN=2.76<…

2013· article· en· W6939485383 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueGreater South Information System · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJet (fluid)AzimuthTransverse planePlane (geometry)Event (particle physics)CollisionFunction (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Measurements of the variation of inclusive jet suppression as a function of relative azimuthal angle, $\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\phi}$, with respect to the elliptic event plane provide insight into the path-length dependence of jet quenching. ATLAS has measured the $\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\phi}$ dependence of jet yields in $0.14\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{nb}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ of $\sqrt{{s}_{NN}}=2.76\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{TeV}$ $\mathrm{Pb}+\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at the LHC for jet transverse momenta ${p}_{T}>45\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$ in different collision centrality bins using an underlying event subtraction procedure that accounts for elliptic flow. The variation of the jet yield with $\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\phi}$ was characterized by the parameter, ${v}_{2}^{\mathrm{jet}}$, and the ratio of out-of-plane ($\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\phi}\ensuremath{\sim}\ensuremath{\pi}/2$) to in-plane ($\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\phi}\ensuremath{\sim}0$) yields. Nonzero ${v}_{2}^{\mathrm{jet}}$ values were measured in all centrality bins for ${p}_{T}<160\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$. The jet yields are observed to vary by as much as 20% between in-plane and out-of-plane directions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.244
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreater South Information SystemSame topicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions ResearchFrench-language works237,207