MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6939632289 · doi:10.6082/uchicago.12708

A User of What, Exactly? Infrastructures of Energy Transition and Planetary Digital Subjectivity

2024· article· en· W6939632289 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge@UChicago (University of Chicago) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWater Governance and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMateriality (auditing)The InternetSubjectivityDisinformationProcess (computing)Subject (documents)Virtual realityInterdependence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This project traces the historical and aesthetic contours of the relationship between the ongoing energy transition, the growing data center industry, and the formation of a reconfigured "user" as a planetary subject, through the Leif Erikson Cable (LEC), a renewable-energy powered fiber optic system currently under construction between Norway and Labrador. While telecommunications and computing have always produced the virtual subject we call the internet user, I argue that it is only as these infrastructures adapt to the changing climate through projects like the LEC that the materiality of the global network has become palpable to the virtual subject, and thereby reconfigured them from user to planet-user. First, I trace a genealogy of the planet-user through literature, art, and architecture, which reveals their descent from Romantic and utopian ideologies of mobility derived from the Roma and other nomads, as manifest in the contemporary figure of the digital nomad/"gypsy". Then, in a process I term "deceleration," this project grounds the planet-user in their materiality through a series of "strata" which investigate the motley local infrastructures of Labrador that support the LEC with similarly varied historical and contemporary documentation. Departing from the ample critical infrastructure studies literature about internet materiality, this project uses a single geographic path to provide a cross-sectional view of the interdependent and increasingly physical socio-energetic infrastructures which produce the virtual subject.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.034
Scholarly communication0.0140.013
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKnowledge@UChicago (University of Chicago)Same topicWater Governance and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207