Additional file 1 of Mechanical power in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: a PARDIE study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Additional file 1. Table S1: Multivariable Analysis for Secondary Outcomes of 28-day VFD (IMV and NIV) and Time to Extubation in Survivors. Table S2: Propensity Score Multivariable Model for Use of High Mechanical Power (≥ 0.62 J min−1 Kg−1 predicted body weight). Table S3: Additional Sensitivity Analyses Limited to the Subgroup of Children <2 years of Age. Table S4: Multivariable models for the Association between Mechanical Energy and 28-day Ventilator-Free Days and Mortality. Table S5: The Univariable Association between each Ventilation Management Component of Mechanical Power and 28-day Ventilator-Free Days. Table S6: Multivariable Model for 28-day Ventilator-Free Days considering all Ventilator Management Components of Mechanical Power (with Delta Pressure) (n = 304). Table S7: Multivariable Model for 28-day Ventilator-Free Days considering all Ventilator Management Components of Mechanical Power (with Peak Inspiratory Pressure) (n=304). Table S8: Structural Equation Modeling. Figure S1: Distribution of Propensity Scores
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.584 | 0.052 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".