MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Redescription of a Middle Devonian placoderm from Manitoba and comments on the polyphyly of <i>Eastmanosteus</i> (Arthrodira: Eubrachythoraci)

2025· article· en· W6939974877 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolyphylyDevonianTaxonGenusIntraspecific competitionPhylogenetic treeVertebrateLate Devonian extinction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arthrodires are the most common and diverse placoderms, an extinct group of early jawed vertebrates. Although commonly found, numerous taxa remain poorly known, thereby complicating the establishment of their taxonomic affinities. An excellent example of this is the genus Eastmanosteus: originally assigned to the wastebasket Dinichthys, it now comprises several species whose description was based on highly incomplete material. Thus, it has been suggested that Eastmanosteus, in turn, has become a wastebasket taxon. Here we redescribe Elmosteus lundarensis gen. et comb. nov., previously assigned to Eastmanosteus. An updated description is provided based on new material recovered from the Elm Point Formation, Middle Devonian (Eifelian–Givetian), near Lake Manitoba, MB, Canada, including gnathal elements, the median dorsal plate, and a ventral view of the skull roof. Parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses were performed, in which the more complete species of Eastmanosteus were included. Elmosteus is recovered as a basal dunkleosteid and all analyses support the polyphyly of Eastmanosteus. A brief discussion about intraspecific variation in El. lundarensis is also provided. Revisions of taxa described long ago, such as Eastmanosteus, using modern techniques like computational phylogenetics is essential for further improved taxonomy. This will lead to a better definition of relationships within placoderms and a better understanding of their diversity, and in turn help us trace the early evolutionary steps of vertebrate traits among stem gnathostomes. https://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C52D3188-ED7F-4C7B-83C6-4A78C88B1591

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.861
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions→French-language works237,207→