A serie of photomicrographs showing the distribution, shape and interrelationships with host minerals and other inclusions of primary type 2 fluid inclusions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Copyright information:Taken from "Physicochemical conditions and timing of rodingite formation: evidence from rodingite-hosted fluid inclusions in the JM Asbestos mine, Asbestos, Québec"http://www.geochemicaltransactions.com/content/8/1/11Geochemical Transactions 2007;8():11-11.Published online 25 Oct 2007PMCID:PMC2174467. (A): Comparatively large type 1 and type 2b fluid inclusion coexisting in the same zoisite crystal (sample Dior-2). The type 2b inclusion is isolated. Two smaller type 1 inclusions are present near the lower left part of the one indicated by a black arrow, which together form a small group. (B): Rod-shaped fluid inclusions in a diopside crystal (sample Dior-1). The inclusions are randomly distributed and are oriented parallel to the axis of the crystal. (C): Image showing acicular inclusions in grossular (Gr) from sample Gran-1b. Some of the inclusions consist of diopside needles and others are fluid filled. The occurrence of these inclusions is restricted to certain sectors within larger grossular crystals (black arrow). Type 2a fluid inclusions in grossular most commonly occur in these acicular clusters. Coarse-grained diopside crystals (Di) are abundant in the grossular and contain the same type of fluid inclusions. (D): Detail of an elongated type 2a fluid inclusion in grossular from sample Gran-1b. (E): Image showing diopside filling interstices between euhedral grossular crystals in veins from sample Slate-1a. A type 2a fluid inclusion in the diopside is shown by a black arrow. The grossular also contain type 2a fluid inclusions. Type 2a fluid inclusions in samples Slate-1a and Gran-1b showed the same behaviour during cryogenic experiments. (F): A type 1c fluid inclusion (black arrow) in vesuvianite sample Ves-2. This inclusion is oriented parallel to the axis of the host crystal. Other needle-shaped inclusions can be seen oriented in the same way. They consist mostly of empty cavities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".