MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Tunable nanolaser based on quasi-BIC in a slanted resonant waveguide grating

2023· other· en· W6940127465 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLasing thresholdNanolaserGratingLaserGuided-mode resonanceWaveguideReflection (computer programming)WavelengthEigenmode expansion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nanolasers based on quasi-bound states in the continuum (quasi-BIC) have attracted much attention owing to its unique optical properties providing strong light–matter interaction. Although various quasi-BIC lasers have been designed, so far, few efforts have been devoted to their tunability in wavelength. Here we propose an approach to employ quasi-BIC and guided mode in a slanted resonant waveguide grating. The proposed structure supports a specially designed eigenmode localized both in the grating and in the DAST layer, which allows to obtain lasing emission and meanwhile the ability to tune the wavelength via electro-optic effect. Numerical simulation results show that the threshold is approximately 7.75 μJ / cm2 with the tuning range being 28 nm. In addition, we show that the distribution of the lasing intensity between the transmission and reflection directions can be controlled by changing the parameters of the structure. This work shows good potential of combining quasi-BIC with guided mode to design tunable nanolaser.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions→French-language works237,207→