MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Lovastatin inhibits erythroleukemia progression through KLF2-mediated suppression of MAPK/ERK signaling

2023· other· en· W6940254405 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLovastatinLeukemiaGene knockdownCell cycleCell growthCell cycle checkpointApoptosisStatinCell culture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Lovastatin, an HMG-CoA inhibitor and an effective cholesterol lowering drug, exhibits anti-neoplastic activity towards several types of cancer, although the underlying mechanism is still not fully understood. Herein, we investigated mechanism of growth inhibition of leukemic cells by lovastatin. Methods RNAseq analysis was used to explore the effect of lovastatin on gene expression in leukemic cells. An animal model of leukemia was used to test the effect of this statin in vivo. FAM83A and DDIT4 expression was knocked-downed in leukemia cells via lentivirus-shRNA. Western blotting, RT-qPCR, cell cycle analysis and apoptosis assays were used to determine the effect of lovastatin-induced growth suppression in leukemic cells in vitro. Results Lovastatin treatment strongly inhibited cancer progression in a mouse model of erythroleukemia induced by Friend virus. In tissue culture, lovastatin inhibited cell proliferation through induction of G1 phase cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Interestingly, lovastatin induced most known genes associated with cholesterol biosynthesis in leukemic cells. Moreover, it suppressed ERK1/2 phosphorylation by downregulating FAM83A and DDIT4, two mediators of MAP-Kinase signaling. RNAseq analysis of lovastatin treated leukemic cells revealed a strong induction of the tumor suppressor gene KLF2. Accordingly, lentivirus-mediated knockdown of KLF2 antagonized leukemia cell suppression induced by lovastatin, associated with higher ERK1/2 phosphorylation compared to control. We further show that KLF2 induction by lovastatin is responsible for lower expression of the FAM83A and DDIT4 oncogenes, involved in the activation of ERK1/2. KLF2 activation by lovastatin also activated a subset of cholesterol biosynthesis genes that may further contribute to leukemia suppression. Conclusions These results implicate KLF2-mediated FAM83A/DDIT4/MAPK suppression and activation of cholesterol biosynthesis as the mechanism of leukemia cell growth inhibition by lovastatin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions→French-language works237,207→