MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6940643855 · doi:10.1002/alz.095361

Speech correlates of neuropsychiatric symptoms in older adults

2025· article· en· W6940643855 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed Central · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeriatric Depression ScaleDementiaMontreal Cognitive AssessmentDepression (economics)CognitionCenter for Epidemiologic Studies Depression ScaleDiseaseCognitive impairment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) including depression and apathy, are common in dementia and profoundly affect both patients and caregivers. These symptoms can manifest early and can be indicative of the disease progression. The existing tools for measuring NPS lack objectivity and are not sensitive enough to detect subtle changes in the earlier stages of dementia. Here, we report a preliminary analysis of the associations of speech markers with NPS in older adults from the Mount Sinai Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC). METHOD: Participants aged 60 and above were recruited through the Mount Sinai ADRC. Cognition was measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA), and NPS by the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI‐Q). Speech samples, collected during description of the “cookie theft” picture. Samples were then transcribed manually and processed using automated acoustic and lexical pipelines. Nonparametric partial correlation analysis was used to examine the relationship of the speech markers with the behavioral measures, adjusting for age, sex, education and MOCA score. RESULT: Participants (N = 54) averaged 79 ± 7.73 years of age, 55.6% were female. They had a mean MOCA score of 24.91 (±4.08), GDS score of 2.6 (±2.59) and NPI‐Q score of 2.17(±3.21). Higher GDS scores, indicative of more severe depression, were associated with higher mean pitch values (r = +0.376, p = 0.015). Higher NPI‐Q scores, reflecting greater NPS severity, were associated with reduced speech complexity, including using more incomplete (r = + 0.350, P = 0.025) and less‐novel (r = +0.313, p = 0.046) words. Higher NPI‐Q scores were also correlated with words with higher valence (i.e., more pleasant content, r = +0.363, p = 0.02) and a tendency toward more dominant speech (r = +0.297, p = 0.059). CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results so far show the potential of speech (both acoustic and lexical features) as a marker for NPS. Specifically, we observed relationships between speech characteristics and self‐reported depression symptoms, as well as NPI scores reflecting symptom severity. Further research is necessary to validate and refine these associations, ultimately paving the way of speech analysis as a promising non‐invasive objective method for detecting subtle behavioral changes in the early stages of dementia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed CentralSame topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsFrench-language works237,207