MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6940666256 · doi:10.11575/prism/39769

Development of an Experimental Platform to Enable Ultrasound Neuromodulation Studies

2022· other· en· W6940666256 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuromodulationHydrophoneUltrasoundUltrasonic sensorField (mathematics)Ultrasound energy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Focused ultrasound (FUS) neuromodulation is the delivery of concentrated mechanical energy into central nervous tissue at low intensity (a few W per cm^2; about as intense as imaging ultrasound, and not sufficiently intense to cause heating) with the goal of eliciting a functional change. It is of interest to applied and clinical scientists as a prospective non-invasive therapeutic intervention; it is also applicable to basic scientists as a tool for in vivo brain mapping. This work details the development of a device and accompanying system that enables the study of ultrasound-mediated neuromodulation in brain tissue samples in a setting with concurrent electrophysiology. We use a novel ultrasound focusing technique based on principles of acoustic reflection, and the first research chapter discusses the development and integration of this focusing technique. To develop and refine our design, I used finite-element modeling and iterative computer optimization techniques. The concordance of these in silico techniques with reality was verified with prototypes and hydrophone acoustic field measurements. Subsequently, several production-quality ultrasound units were produced to the specifications determined by modeling; these units exhibited performance improvements based on the results from testing prototypes, and they were characterized in terms of efficiency, electrical impedance, and ultrasonic pressure field shape. We used two independent methods to verify the absolute acoustic intensity output by our device: radiation-force absorber measurements in conjunction with wide-field hydrophone scans, and then later a calibrated hydrophone. The second research chapter of this manuscript describes the application of our system to neuroscientific experiments: I detail how we obtained early data pertaining to the ability of pulsed FUS to modulate field potential activity in acute animal brain slices. We observed an intensity-dependent modulation effect in a majority of slices tested (>50%, n=44); however, this effect was determined to be dominated by a confound and unlikely to be physiological. This course of study explored and evaluated a novel technique for obtaining an ultrasound focus; it also yielded a system that enables further experiments into interactions between FUS and brain tissue. This manuscript, the devices resulting from the work, and the documentation included in the appendices will enable continued investigations into ultrasound neuromodulation at the University of Calgary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRISM (University of Calgary)Same topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsFrench-language works237,207