Income Effects in Global Value Chains Driven by EU Exports
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter provides an overview of the main trends and patterns in income effects in global value chains driven by EU exports during the period 1995-2011. It makes an extensive use of indicators illustrating the relationship between trade, employment and income (expressed as value added) for the EU as a whole and for each EU Member State using the World Input-Output Database (WIOD) as the source for the data. The indicators relate to the EU's exports to the rest of the world with a geographical breakdown of the data that includes the 27 EU Member States (Croatia was not yet a Member State in the period covered by this analysis), Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Mexico, Russia, South Korea, Taiwan, the United States of America, and an aggregate “Rest of the World” region.\nThese data allow to examine for the first time the evolution of the income flows supported by EU exports including time after the outbreak of the global financial crisis. Furthermore, the current analysis offers more specific insights into some key EU bilateral trade relationships in terms of the income flows that they support.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it