MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The magnetic field and confined wind of the O star

2006· article· en· W6940689937 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSpringer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGloomField (mathematics)NucleofectionNoise (video)Fusible alloy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims.In this paper we confirm the presence of a globally-ordered, kG-strength magnetic field in the photosphere of the young O star $\theta^1$ Orionis C, and examine the properties of its optical line profile variations. Methods.A new series of high-resolution MuSiCoS Stokes V and I spectra has been acquired which samples approximately uniformly the rotational cycle of $\theta^1$ Orionis C. Using the Least-Squares Deconvolution (LSD) multiline technique, we have succeeded in detecting variable Stokes V Zeeman signatures associated with the LSD mean line profile. These signatures have been modeled to determine the magnetic field geometry. We have furthermore examined the profile variations of lines formed in both the wind and photosphere using dynamic spectra. Results.Based on spectrum synthesis fitting of the LSD profiles, we determine that the polar strength of the magnetic dipole component is $1150 \la B_{\rm d}\la 1800$ G and that the magnetic obliquity is $27\degr \la \beta \la 68\degr$, assuming $i=45\pm 20\degr$. The best-fit values for $i=45\degr$ are $B_{\rm d} = 1300 \pm 150~{\rm G}~ (1\sigma)$ and $\beta = 50\degr \pm 6\degr\ (1\sigma)$. Our data confirm the previous detection of a magnetic field in this star, and furthermore demonstrate the sinusoidal variability of the longitudinal field and accurately determine the phases and intensities of the magnetic extrema. The analysis of “photospheric” and “wind” line profile variations supports previous reports of the optical spectroscopic characteristics, and provides evidence for infall of material within the magnetic equatorial plane.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpringer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)Same topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsFrench-language works237,207