MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6940802757 · doi:10.11575/prism/30094

Engaging Newcomers in Physical Activity to Support Healthy Early Childhood Development

2013· other· en· W6940802757 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2013
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysical activityEarly childhoodPoliticsWork (physics)Settlement (finance)Child developmentEarly childhood educationPolicy developmentPositive Youth Development

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The importance of physical activity on our well-being and health is well understood. So too is our understanding of the importance of a healthy early childhood development. A third area of extensive research revolves around newcomer engagement and settlement. However, little is known about the compound effect of all of these issues together. This study explores the following: 1) What physical activity programs and services exist for newcomer children; 2) What limits the participation of newcomer children in physical activity; 3) What encourages their participation and; 4) What additional supports could stem from strong guiding policy and initiatives on physical activity for newcomer children. There is limited direct research related to physical activity and newcomer children. Thus, extrapolation of related literature which stresses the importance of physical activity in early childhood development leads to the conclusion that the same must be true for newcomer populations. A review of programs and services in Canada suggests there are many supports for newcomer youth who wish to be physically active, but very limited programming for younger children under the age of five, in other words, pre-school aged children. This study consisted of structured interviews of five key informants from organizations across Canada that work with newcomer children and youth. The interviews explored the types of programs offered, the barriers faced by the newcomers that impede their participation in physical activity, the availability of political backing, funding and policy to support their initiatives, and whether these programs and services were useful tools with regards to a positive settlement experience for newcomer families. Information obtained from the key informants consisted of their accounts of their own experiences, their opinions, as well as some primary data from their internal research. The results of these surveys suggest that physical activity initiatives are well-appreciated services by newcomers. Additionally, they suggest that organized physical activity provides a great opportunity for organizations to address many additional issues facing new Canadians. Physical activity programs for newcomer children have the capacity to not only contribute to positive early childhood development, but to help newcomer children settle into their new communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→Same topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions→French-language works237,207→