Estimating Spot Price and Smooth Forward Curve in Electricity Markets with Bayesian Penalized Spline
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The first part of this thesis presents a Bayesian penalized spline approach to constructing smooth forward curves in electricity markets. Since electricity should be delivered as a continuous flow, power contracts have settlement periods rather than a fixed delivery time. In addition, electricity forward curves have strong seasonal shape. Our approach provides a method for estimating a continuous forward price curve from market forward prices quoted over a period. The approach is illustrated using observed market data from the Mid-Columbia (Mid-C) and California Oregon Border (COB) pricing hubs. Since Mid-C is a liquid market where forward contracts are quoted every day and COB is an illiquid hub, a two step estimation procedure is developed from Bayesian perspective.First, the Mid-C smooth curve is constructed using Bayesian penalized spline. Next, the COB smooth curve is estimated by adding a spread to the constructed Mid-C smooth curve and incorporating the positive spread between the two hubs as an informative prior. In the second part, we present a mean reverting model for the electricity spot price and we employ a Bayesian penalized spline approach to model the deterministic seasonal function exhibited in the monthly averages. Based on the historical spot price from Alberta power market, we calibrated the model parameters, also by implementing Bayesian estimation techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".