Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research-creation is a photographic-videographic approach to the concept of fatherhood. It is based on my experience as a father of two children aged ten and thirteen since our arrival as a family in Canada in 2022. It is a panoramic view of a time of change where, facing the challenges of fatherhood towards growing children, I begin a search in my years as a son with a father (who passed away in 2018) who marked and still marks my becoming in the world as well as my work as a father. His memory and his way of exercising fatherhood influence mine, which I feel as a middle ground between what I lived in my childhood-adolescence and the present-future of my children. If being a father implies conflicts and disagreements, how do childhood memories and reminiscences influence my practice as a father and the models I try to transmit to my children? My base of work is the world of family photography and filmmaking. Belonging to the environment that is photographed and filmed is a very powerful artistic-reflexive practice that opens thought to what is common to us as humans: the constant presence of belonging and separation in our work as parents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.060 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".