MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6940879092 · doi:10.11575/prism/49510

Delay in Accessing Primary Health Care and its Impacts among Nepalese Immigrants Population in Canada

2023· other· en· W6940879092 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReferralLogistic regressionImmigrationHealth carePopulationService (business)Health services

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Equitable access to healthcare across the population, irrespective of social economic factors and area of residence, is crucial. Delay in seeking care may decrease care access, later diagnosis, and delayed or inadequate treatment of health conditions which leads to poor health outcomes. This study aimed to assess delay in accessing PHC and associated factors among Nepalese immigrants residing in Calgary. Methods: A cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire was conducted in 2019. Delay in accessing care was measured based on a single-item question: “During the past 12 months, was there ever a time that you had to delay seeking medical service within any of the following services (multiple answers allowed)?” A follow-up question about associated factors was asked, and the responses were categorized into availability, accessibility, and acceptability. Descriptive and multivariable logistic regression was employed to assess the association between delay in accessing care and its predictors by using STATA. Results: Of 401 study participants, over two-thirds (n=266; 66.33%) reported that they had a care delay during the 12 months. Delay in accessing care was over two times higher among those aged 26-45 (AOR 2.98) compared to those under 25 years of age, which was nearly seven times higher (AOR 6.96) among the older participants (≥56 year). The top two areas of delaying accessing care were referral and related services (69.17%) and dental and related services (55.64%). The top three reasons reported were waiting time (77.82%), cost (55.64%), services availability (53.38%). Overall, accessibility (n=170, 63.91%), availability (n=225, 84.59%), and acceptability (n=135, 50.75%) were a barrier to access care. Those who reported delay in accessing care also reported an impact on their lives personally and economically. The most reported personal impact was mental health impact, including worry, anxiety, and stress (n=198, 74.72%), and the most common economic impact reported was increased use of over-the-counter drugs (n=114, 43.02%). Conclusion: Delay in accessing care is presented in the Nepalese immigrant population that impacts individuals’ personal health, daily life activities, and financial capacity. Strategies to improve access to PHC for deprived populations are crucial and need to be tackled effectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→Same topicMigration, Health and Trauma→French-language works237,207→