MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6940897627 · doi:10.1016/j.inv.2025.100041

Pseudocapacitive batteries: Methods of activating quantized capacitance energy storage mechanism

2025· article· en· W6940897627 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueInvention Disclosure · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnergy storageElectrochemical energy storageCapacitanceSupercapacitorCoulomb blockadeBattery (electricity)NanoparticleComputer data storageElectrochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The invention embodies a method to incorporate nanoparticles in an energy storage device, more specifically batteries and supercapacitors, to enable quantized capacitance energy storage mechanism. It operates on the principle of quantization in nanoscale, also referred to as the solvated Coulomb blockade mechanism, rather than the classical intercalation mechanism, allowing greater electron storage potential within the nanoparticles relative to classical energy storage devices. This enables pseudocapacitive battery to theoretically store as much energy as lithium-ion batteries while all its other properties resemble ultracapacitors, including the theoretical ability to have long cycle life and can be charged and discharged at very high rates, a significant departure from lithium-ion battery technology which are well known to have long charging times. This invention also enables electrochemical storage devices to be designed with sustainable materials (e.g., carbon), transitioning from the heavy reliance on precious metals (e.g., lithium, manganese, cobalt, and nickel).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInvention DisclosureSame topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsFrench-language works237,207