MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6940968475 · doi:10.7939/r3-t8gj-g984

A Sodium Wasting Phenotype and Disrupted Collecting Duct Function in Ae1 R607H and L919X Knock-In Mice

2024· dissertation· en· W6940968475 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistal renal tubular acidosisIntercalated CellMetabolic acidosisUrinary systemKidneyReabsorptionSodiumDistal convoluted tubuleRenal sodium reabsorption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The kidney collecting duct, composed of principal and intercalated cells (ICs), fine-tunes urine composition by regulating fluid, electrolyte, and acid-base homeostasis. Type A intercalated cells (A-ICs) facilitate proton secretion into the urine through an apical proton ATPase and mediate bicarbonate reabsorption into the blood via a basolateral kidney anion exchanger 1 (kAE1). Genetic mutations that impact IC function, for example mutations to SLC4A1 (kAE1), can lead to distal renal tubular acidosis (dRTA). dRTA results in metabolic acidosis, failed urinary acidification, and an unexplained urinary sodium-wasting phenotype. In vivo data from transgenic mice and dRTA patients’ kidney biopsies indicate that a loss of kAE1 results in a decreased abundance of ICs. This is evident in the previously published Ae1 R607H knock-in (KI) mouse model (orthologous to human AE1 R589H mutation) that recapitulates classical metabolic acidosis. Our lab obtained a second, unpublished mouse model, the Ae1 L919X KI mice (orthologous to human AE1 R901X mutation). We hypothesize that these mice, with a decreased abundance of A-ICs, are an effective model for studying the persistent urinary sodium loss. The objectives of our work were to 1) characterize the Ae1 L919X KI mice, 2) determine whether the two mouse models accurately reflect the urinary ion loss seen in dRTA patients, and 3) begin investigating the mechanisms causing the urinary sodium loss in these mice. To test our hypothesis, wildtype and dRTA mutant mice were fed a salt-depleted diet, an acid diet, or a salt- depleted acid diet. Following these dietary challenges, analysis of plasma and urine ion concentrations and pH, and qRT-PCR and immunoblots on whole kidney tissues was completed. At baseline, similar to homozygous R607H KI mice, the homozygous L919X KI mice exhibit typical dRTA features including alkaline urine and a reduced number of A-ICs. The salt-depletion and acid challenge alone revealed preliminary evidence of disrupted collecting duct function in the mutant animals compared to WT. Following the salt-depleted acid diet, both dRTA mutant mice exhibited a urinary sodium loss. Additionally, both homozygous mutant mice showed evidence of upregulated gene and protein expression of tight junction proteins claudin-4 and claudin-10b, suggesting an involvement of the paracellular pathway to compensate for the failing transcellular pathways within the collecting duct. Overall, our findings reveal that both mutant mice appropriately model dRTA pathophysiology, including the urinary sodium wasting phenotype seen in human patients, and suggest a compensatory upregulation of the paracellular transport pathway. As kidney disease is a prominent health concern in Canada, this project contributes to the growing body of knowledge on how various nephron segments communicate with each other to regulate ion homeostasis in our body. Our understanding of the relationship between acid-base balance and sodium reabsorption, can not only provide improved treatment options for dRTA patients, but also to those living with other electrolyte imbalance disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsFrench-language works237,207