MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6940986604 · doi:10.13130/2282-0035/13220

Italian

2020· article· en· W6940986604 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRiviste UNIMI (Università degli studi di Milano) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNomePrime timeContext (archaeology)Prime minister

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kanata che significa villaggio nella lingua degli indiani d'America, il titolo dello spettacolo del franco-canadese Robert Lepage che ha debuttato a Parigi il 15 dicembre 2018.La controversia che aveva accompagnato lo spettacolo sui Nativi o Prime Nazioni, sin dall'estate, riguardava la rappresentativit del Teatro a parlare a nome di una minoranza che ha subito durante i 500 anni di colonialismo, un vero genocidio.I rappresentanti delle Prime Nazioni hanno cercato di impedire lo svolgimento dello spettacolo, chiedendo di inserire veri indiani per dare "realt", consistenza e verit alla parola teatrale.Al rifiuto del regista seguito un dibattito mediatico che metteva in discussione il concetto di impersonificazione.Dal tema della "crisi della presenza" di Ernesto De Martino al "panico del Dasein totale" di Hito Steyerl, nel saggio si cercato di riflettere sul valore attuale di "maschera teatrale".For the first time the director Ariane Mnouchkine, founder of the Thtre du Soleil in the 1960s, left the direction of a show by her theater company to another artist.He is the award-winning director and actor Robert Lepage, born in Qubec city.The show tells the story of Indian natives in Canada but immediately before the premire, the story takes on the tones of a cultural controversy.Mnouchkine and Lepage are accused of "cultural appropriation": who has the right to tell the dramatic

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.504
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRiviste UNIMI (Università degli studi di Milano)Same topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsFrench-language works237,207