Vegetation and Forest Fire Dynamics in Alberta: A Ground and Remote Sensing Data Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis presents a comprehensive analysis of the interplay between forest fires and vegetation dynamics in Alberta, Canada, under the lens of climate change. By synthesizing data from remote sensing, climate records, and fire databases, the study reveals the intricate relationships between vegetation cover changes and climatic factors throughout 2001–2022. It highlights the significant lead and lag times between the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and climate variables such as Land Surface Temperature (LST), relative humidity, and precipitation, offering insights into the temporal dynamics of vegetation response to climatic influences. The research further explores the patterns and trends of forest fires, correlating them with interpolated climate data across various subregions. Using trend analysis and anomaly detection methods, the study identifies significant warming and drying trends, alongside variable precipitation changes, which have influenced both human-caused and lightning-induced forest fires. The findings underscore the differential impact of climate variables on fire occurrence and source, with notable patterns emerging in subregions like Athabasca Plain and Central Mixedwood. Building on these insights, the thesis develops a robust forest fire spread model, validated through high-precision simulations of the 2011 Slave Lake and 2016 Fort McMurray wildfires. The model leverages regional physical features, climatic data, and MODIS datasets to offer accurate fire behavior predictions. The phased simulation approach adapts to dynamic factors such as weather conditions and firefighting strategies, enhancing the model's applicability for effective fire management. Ultimately, this thesis aims to bridge the gap between theoretical understanding and practical application, providing valuable contributions to Alberta's forest fire management and community protection strategies. The research paves the way for more informed decision-making in the face of climate change by offering a nuanced understanding of fire-vegetation-climate interactions and developing an advanced predictive model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".