MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6941085881 · doi:10.11575/prism/39226

Structural Variations of Apatite Solid Solutions, Ca10(PO4)6(F,Cl,OH)2

2021· other· en· W6941085881 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersArgonne National LaboratoryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNucleofectionPhase (matter)LiquationHexamethylbenzene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apatite, Ca10(PO4)6(F,Cl,OH)2, is the most abundant phosphate mineral in the world with numerous uses in geology, materials science, biology, medicine, agriculture, and dentistry. The three main natural end members are fluorapatite (Ca10(PO4)6F2), chlorapatite (Ca10(PO4)6Cl2), and hydroxylapatite (Ca10(PO4)6OH2). Quantitative chemical compositions and backscattered electron (BSE) images on twenty-four natural apatite samples, from various locations, were obtained with an electron-probe microanalyzer (EPMA). Varying cation and anion content led to distinctive zoning and unique crystal features. Eight samples were selected and studied with synchrotron high-resolution powder X-ray diffraction (HRPXRD). All eight samples observed a hexagonal structure (P63/m), consisting of a phosphate tetrahedron, a Ca1 polyhedron, and a Ca2 polyhedron. The Ca1 site is a 9-coordinated system and the Ca2 site is a 6-coordinated with an addition anion containing either F, Cl and/or OH. Five of the seven samples were found to be single- phased fluorapatites with varying features and cation/anion content. Cation substitutions, such as Mn substituting for Ca in sample 1W2, reduces the cell parameters of apatite (a, c, V). Four samples displayed unique zoning (1V9, 1E9, SM and 1V5), however only 1E9 and SM were found to be multiphase apatites, with all phases being hexagonal in structure. Sample SM exhibited three phases - with fluorapatite being the primary phase along with 2 guest phases. Sample 1E9 displayed two separate phases of fluorapatite and hydroxylapatite, with the OH residing at 0.224 Å and F placed on the mirror planes at 0,0, 1⁄4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRISM (University of Calgary)→Same topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions→French-language works237,207→