MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Analysis on the Perceptions Toward Mild Cognitive Impairment and Medical Willingness among Population Aged over 55 Years in Shanghai Based on a Proactive Health Perspective

2024· article· en· W6941107864 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommunity healthIntervention (counseling)PopulationCognitive impairmentUrban communityLogistic regressionService (business)Montreal Cognitive AssessmentPsychological intervention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Proactive health is an important measure to implement the Healthy China strategy. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is an important breakthrough point for early detection and intervention of cognitive impairment disorders and it is also a key link in the realization of brain health. Objective To activate the initial health intervention among community population and fully realize the construction of a healthy China by understanding the perceptions and medical willingness among community populations aged over 55 years in Shanghai. Methods From October to December 2021, one district of Shanghai's urban and suburban areas was randomly selected (Yangpu District for the urban area and Jiading District for the suburban area), and 1-2 community health service centers were randomly selected from each district (Daqiao Community Health Service Center and Dinghai Community Health Service Center for Yangpu District, and Jiading Town Community Health Service Center for Jiading District). An on-site face-to-face questionnaire survey was conducted among the residents waiting for outpatient consultation at the community health service centers in accordance with the inclusion criteria. The content of community populations' perceptions questionnaire included: (1) general demographic characteristics; (2) the level of MCI disease awareness among the community population; (3) the medical willingness of the community population. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the factors influencing the medical willingness of the community population. Results A total of 970 questionnaires were distributed and 951 valid questionnaires were recovered, with a valid recovery rate of 98.04%. (1) The total score of the community populations' perceptions questionnaire for MCI was (14.55±5.24), 51.3% (488/951) of the community populations were aware of "mild cognitive impairment", mainly through the media (61.7%, 301/488) ; 59.9% (570/951) of the populations believede that "mild cognitive impairment occurs in old age"; 14.1% (134/951) of the population had participated in relevant screening activities; 6.2% (59/951) had consulted a doctor for memory impairment or suspected cognitive impairment. (2) Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that family history of cognitive impairment, knowledge and understanding of MCI as well as personal experience were all influencing factors of community populations' medical willingness for MCI. Conclusion Community population aged over 55 years have poor MCI disease perceptions and poor medical willingness. The community populations with poor knowledge, biased understanding of MCI and lack of relevant practical experience had poor medical willingness. It is suggested that multi-angle publicity should be carried out to improve the perceptions of MCI disease in the community and provide comprehensive support, to improve the accessibility of proactive health, and explore effective ways to promote proactive health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.477
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions→French-language works237,207→