Advanced MRI methods for probing disease severity and functional decline in multiple sclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic and severe disease of the central nervous system characterized by complex pathology including inflammatory demyelination and neurodegeneration. MS impacts >2.8 million people worldwide, with most starting with a relapsing-remitting form (RRMS) in young adulthood, and many of them worsening to a secondary-progressive course (SPMS) despite treatment. So, there is a clear need for improved disease characterization. MRI is an ideal tool for non-invasive assessment of MS pathology, but there is still no established measure of disease activity and functional consequences. This project aims to overcome the challenge by developing novel imaging measures based on brain diffusion MRI and phase congruency texture analysis of conventional MRI. Through advanced modeling and analysis of clinically feasible brain MRI, this thesis investigates whether and how the derived measures differentiate MS pathology types and disease severity and predict functional outcomes in MS. The overall process has led to important technical innovations in several aspects. These include: innovative modeling of simple diffusion acquisitions to generate high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI) measures; new optimization and harmonization techniques for diffusion MRI; innovative neural network models to create new diffusion data for comprehensive HARDI modeling; and novel methods and a graphic user interface for optimizing phase congruency analyses. Assisted by different machine learning methods, collective findings show that advanced measures from both diffusion MRI and phase congruency are highly sensitive to subtle differences in MS pathology, which differentiate disease severity between RRMS and SPMS through multi-dimensional analyses including chronic active lesions, and predict functional outcomes especially in physical and neurocognitive domains. These results are clinically translational and the new measures and techniques can help improve the evaluation and management of both MS and similar diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".