MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Meta-analysis of Risk Factors for Urinary Tract Infection in Neurogenic Bladder

2023· article· en· W6941264280 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrinary systemMeta-analysisNeurogenic bladder dysfunctionComplicationUrinary bladderQuality of life (healthcare)Risk factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Urinary tract infection is the most common complication in patients with neurogenic bladder, which severely affects the treatment effect and quality of life of patients. Early identification of its related factors and delivery of targeted measures of prevention and intervention are of great significance to improve the prognosis of patients. Recent studies on influencing factors of urinary tract infection in neurogenic bladder are increasing but have controversial results, and there is a lack of relevant systematic reviews and support from evidence-based medicine. Objective To systematically assess the risk factors of urinary tract infection in neurogenic bladder. Methods Databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang Data, CQVIP, and SinoMed were searched for literature on risk factors of urinary tract infection in patients with neurogenic bladder from inception to June 2022. The quality of the included literature was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) . RevMan 5.3 was used for meta-analysis. Results A total of 13 articles with 3 319 cases were included. The NOS score of the articles ranged from 6 to 8. Meta-analysis results showed that advanced age〔OR≥60=2.50, 95%CI (1.83, 3.41) , P<0.000 01; OR≥65=2.13, 95%CI (1.40, 3.25) , P=0.000 4〕, diabetes〔OR=3.17, 95%CI (2.58, 3.89) , P<0.000 01〕, hypoalbuminemia〔OR=2.26, 95%CI (1.67, 3.06) , P<0.000 01〕, number of strokes ≥2〔OR=3.30, 95%CI (1.70, 6.41) , P=0.000 4〕, indwelling catheter〔OR=2.88, 95%CI (2.09, 3.95) , P<0.000 01〕, frequency of intermittent catheterization ≥2 times/week〔OR=2.44, 95%CI (1.62, 3.68) , P<0.000 1〕, frequency of bladder irrigation≥3 times/week〔OR=2.63, 95%CI (1.66, 4.17) , P<0.000 1〕, duration of bladder function training intervention≥2 weeks〔OR=2.75, 95%CI (1.69, 4.46) , P<0.000 1〕, duration of rehabilitation intervention >7 d〔OR=3.03, 95%CI (1.42, 6.48) , P=0.004〕were associated with increased risk of urinary tract infection in neurogenic bladder; Male〔OR=0.78, 95%CI (0.63, 0.96) , P=0.02〕was associated with decreased risk of urinary tract infection in neurogenic bladder. Conclusion Older age, complicated with diabetes, hypoalbuminemia, number of strokes ≥2, indwelling catheter, frequency of intermittent catheterization ≥2 times/week, frequency of bladder irrigation ≥3 times/week, duration of bladder function training intervention ≥2 weeks, and duration of rehabilitation intervention >7 d may be the risk factors for urinary tract infection in neurogenic bladder. To prevent or reduce the risk of urinary tract infection in these patients, clinical workers should identify the aforementioned high-risk factors as early as possible, and provide the patients with interventions targeting the controllable factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0210.071
Bibliometrics0.0080.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.383
GPT teacher head0.503
Teacher spread0.120 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions→French-language works237,207→