Comparison of sap flow and eddy fluxes of water vapor from a boreal deciduous forest
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Water flux to the atmosphere was measured from a mature stand of aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) in Saskatchewan, Canada, as part of the Boreal Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study (BOREAS). Diurnal and seasonal changes in transpiration were monitored using two sap flow techniques and were compared against the difference between eddy correlation measurements of water vapor flux made above and below the aspen canopy. The three methods showed similar diurnal and seasonal trends in water flux, although sap flow lagged the eddy correlation measurements by about 1 hour diurnally due to changes in water storage within the trees. During the growing season, all methods showed a linear increase in midday transpiration with above-canopy vapor pressure deficit (VPD) up to ∼1 kPa, beyond which transpiration was relatively constant (VPD 1–2.5 kPa). A similar relationship was obtained when total daily transpiration was plotted against mean daytime VPD. The results are consistent with other observations that stomatal conductance of the aspen canopy decreases at high VPD. The complementary benefits of simultaneous monitoring of canopy transpiration by both eddy correlation and sap flow measurements are discussed. An edited version of this paper was published by AGU. Copyright 1997 American Geophysical Union.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".