Fostering Through Flushing: Reimagining the Public Toilet Typology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the most intimate, yet public level of interaction between user and architecture, public toilets have remained a neglected site of banality within our urban environments. Existing public toilets are currently stretched thin over a wide geography across Vancouver and act as introverted objects that do not engage with their surroundings. This thesis investigates our perceptions, attitudes, and expectations around its overlapping scales, focusing on the changing role public toilets plays within our cities. Given that these spaces are impacted by factors outside of basic biological need and function, this thesis goes beyond the basic program of the standard toilet to provide an opportunity to redesign the public toilets as a tool for social innovation. Through examination of public toilets as vital pieces of the city’s infrastructure, a new typology is created to accommodate a plurality of users in today’s world while fostering community through added layering of programming. Consideration of these spaces as sites where cultural, technological, and environmental forces converge will inform the basis for a reimagination of underutilized spaces in our city, the parking garage, as valuable and exciting public spaces that encourage a new porosity in public toilets to allow activity and new forms of community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".