MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6942327403 · doi:10.14288/1.0308103

A voyage to the Pacific Ocean undertaken, by the command of His Majesty, for making discoveries in the Northern hemisphere, to determine the position and extent of the west side of North America; its distance from Asia; and the practicability of a northern passage to Europe. Vol. III

2016· article· en· W6942327403 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPARRYPosition (finance)Pacific oceanOrder (exchange)Making-ofCanon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"Plates found bound variously. Lada-Mocarski gives a lengthy note on the subject. He considers that the 62d. plate by Bentolozzi after Webber, representing the death of Cook, is an extra plate not present in many copies. The long delayed official account of the voyage "edited, emended, added to and drastically tidied up by Canon Douglas":- J.H. Parry in the Canadian Historical Review, vo1.49, no.I, March, 1968, P.77. The first edition sold out in three days, ref. Holmes. J.C. Beaglehole gives a detailed history of the publication and its sources in his edition of the Journals (no.I25), vol.3, pt.I, p.cxcviii-cciv. Here are listed only editions and translations of the official account. There were in addition numerous abridgements, collected voyages, and popularizations." -- Strathern, G. M., & Edwards, M. H. (1970). Navigations, traffiques & discoveries, 1774-1848: A guide to publications relating to the area now British Columbia. Victoria, BC: University of Victoria, p. 62. "Published by Order of the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty" -- Title page.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Collections→Same topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions→French-language works237,207→