MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6942534053 · doi:10.14288/1.0428828

HART - 2021 Census of Canada - Selected Characteristics of Census Households for Housing Need - Canada, all provinces and territories at the Census Division (CD) and Census Subdivision (CSD) level [custom tabulation]

2023· dataset· en· W6942534053 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCensusSubdivisionAmerican Community SurveyTable (database)Quarter (Canadian coin)Nova scotia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Note: The data release is complete as of August 14th, 2023. 1. (Added April 4th) Canada and Census Divisions = Early April 2023 2. (Added May 1st) Ontario, British Columbia, and Alberta Census Subdivisions (CSDs) = Late April 2023 3a. (Added June 8th) Manitoba and Saskatchewan CSDs 3b. (Added June 12th) Quebec CSDs = June 12th 2023 4. (Added June 30th) Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia CSDs = Early July 2023 5. (Added August 14th) Yukon, Northwest Territories, and Nunavut CSDs = Early August 2023. For more information, please visit HART.ubc.ca. Housing Assessment Resource Tools (HART) This dataset contains 18 tables which draw upon data from the 2021 Census of Canada. The tables are a custom order and contains data pertaining to core housing need and characteristics of households. 17 of the tables each cover a different geography in Canada: one for Canada as a whole, one for all Canadian census divisions (CD), and 15 for all census subdivisions (CSD) across Canada. The last table contains the median income for all geographies. Statistics Canada used these median incomes as the "area median household income (AMHI)," from which they derived some of the data fields within the Shelter Costs/Household Income dimension. Included alongside the data tables is a guide to HART's housing need assessment methodology. This guide is intended to support independent use of HART's custom data both to allow for transparent verification of our analysis, as well as supporting efforts to utilize the data for analysis beyond what HART did. There are many data fields in the data order that we did not use that may be of value for others. The dataset is in Beyond 20/20 (.ivt) format. The Beyond 20/20 browser is required in order to open it. This software can be freely downloaded from the Statistics Canada website: https://www.statcan.gc.ca/eng/public/beyond20-20 (Windows only). For information on how to use Beyond 20/20, please see: http://odesi2.scholarsportal.info/documentation/Beyond2020/beyond20-quickstart.pdf https://wiki.ubc.ca/Library:Beyond_20/20_Guide Custom order from Statistics Canada includes the following dimensions and data fields: Geography: - Country of Canada, all CDs & Country as a whole - All 10 Provinces (Newfoundland, Prince Edward Island (PEI), Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Quebec, Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, and British Columbia), all CSDs & each Province as a whole - All 3 Territories (Nunavut, Northwest Territories, Yukon), all CSDs & each Territory as a whole Data Quality and Suppression: - The global non-response rate (GNR) is an important measure of census data quality. It combines total non-response (households) and partial non-response (questions). A lower GNR indicates a lower risk of non-response bias and, as a result, a lower risk of inaccuracy. The counts and estimates for geographic areas with a GNR equal to or greater than 50% are not published in the standard products. The counts and estimates for these areas have a high risk of non-response bias, and in most cases, should not be released. - Area suppression is used to replace all income characteristic data with an 'x' for geographic areas with populations and/or number of households below a specific threshold. If a tabulation contains quantitative income data (e.g., total income, wages), qualitative data based on income concepts (e.g., low income before tax status) or derived data based on quantitative income variables (e.g., indexes) for individuals, families or households, then the following rule applies: income characteristic data are replaced with an 'x' for areas where the population is less than 250 or where the number of private households is less than 40. Source: Statistics Canada - When showing count data, Statistics Canada employs random rounding in order to reduce the possibility of identifying individuals within the tabulations. Random rounding transforms all raw counts to random rounded counts. Reducing the possibility of identifying individuals within the tabulations becomes pertinent for very small (sub)populations. All counts greater than 10 are rounded to a base of 5, meaning they will end in either 0 or 5. The random rounding algorithm controls the results and rounds the unit value of the count according to a predetermined frequency. Counts ending in 0 or 5 are not changed. Counts of 10 or less are rounded to a base of 10, meaning they will be rounded to either 10 or zero. Universe: Full Universe: Private Households in Non-farm Non-band Off-reserve Occupied Private Dwellings with Income Greater than zero. Households examined for Core Housing Need: Private, non-farm, non-reserve, owner- or renter-households with incomes greater than zero and shelter-cost-to-income ratios less than 100% are assessed for 'Core Housing Need.' Non-family Households with at least one household maintainer aged 15 to 29 attending school are considered not to be in Core Housing Need, regardless of their housing circumstances. Data Fields: Note 1: Certain data fields from the original .ivt files were not included in the .csv extracts. Those data fields have been marked with an asterisk (*) below. Note 2: Certain data fields are new for the 2021 census data order. Those data fields have been marked with a double asterisk (**) below. Note 3: Certain data fields appear in a different order in 2021 compared to 2016. Those data fields have been marked with a triple asterisk (***) below. Housing indicators in Core Housing Universe (12) 1. Total - Private Households by core housing need status* 2. Households examined for core housing need 3. Households in core housing need 4. Below one standard only* 5. Below affordability standard only* 6. Below adequacy standard only* 7. Below suitability standard only* 8. Below 2 or more standards* 9. Below affordability and suitability* 10. Below affordability and adequacy* 11. Below suitability and adequacy* 12. Below affordability, suitability, and adequacy* Tenure Including Presence of Mortgage and Subsidized Housing; Household size (13) 1. Total - Private households by tenure including presence of mortgage payments and subsidized housing* 2. Owner* 3. With mortgage* 4. Without mortgage* 5. Renter* 6. Subsidized housing* 7. Not subsidized housing* 8. Total - Household size 9. 1 person 10. 2 persons 11. 3 persons 12. 4 persons 13. 5 or more persons household Shelter costs groups/statistics (20) 1. Total – Private households by household income proportion to AMHI_1 2. Households with income 20% or under of area median household income (AMHI) 3. Households with income 21% to 50% of AMHI 4. Households with income 51% to 80% of AMHI 5. Households with income 81% to 120% of AMHI 6. Households with income 121% or more of AMHI 7. Total – Private households by household income proportion to AMHI_2* 8. Households with income 30% and under of AMHI* 9. Households with income 31% to 60% of AMHI* 10. Households with income 61% or more of AMHI* 11. Total – Private households by shelter cost proportion to AMHI_1* 12. Households with shelter cost 0.5% and under of AMHI* 13. Households with shelter cost 0.6% to 1.25% of AMHI* 14. Households with shelter cost 1.26% to 2% of AMHI* 15. Households with shelter cost 2.1% to 3% of AMHI* 16. Households with shelter cost 3.1% or more of AMHI* 17. Total – Private households by shelter cost proportion to AMHI_2* 18. Households with shelter cost 0.75% or under of AMHI* 19. Households with shelter cost 0.76% to 1.5% of AMHI* 20. Households with shelter cost 1.6% or more of AMHI* Selected characteristics of the households (65) 1. Total – Private households by presence of at least one or of the combined activity limitations (Q11d or Q11e or combined)*** 2. Household has at least one person with activity limitations reported for Q11d and Q11e or combined Q11d and Q11e health issues*** 3. Total - Private households by presence of at least one or of the combined activity limitations (Q11a, Q11b, Q11c or Q11f or combined)*** 4. Household has at least one person who had at least one or of combined activity limitations reported for Q11a, Q11b, Q11c or Q11f*** 5.Total - P

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.012
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0680.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Collections→French-language works237,207→