MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6942697430 · doi:10.14288/1.0438335

Evaluating the environmental performance of black soldier fly meal and its potential use as a sustainable feed input in the egg industry : a life cycle assessment

2023· article· en· W6942697430 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Utilization and Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLife-cycle assessmentSustainabilityProduction (economics)Environmental impact assessmentAdaptabilitySupply chainBiomass (ecology)Quality (philosophy)Hermetia illucens

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Feed production is responsible for a major share of the environmental burdens of egg production. Identifying alternative, low-impact feed resources is therefore a priority for sustainability management in this sector. Valorization of biomass waste via insect production represents a promising strategy to produce a low-impact and high quality protein source for feeds. Among insect species, Black soldier fly (BSF) is the preferred option because of its higher feed conversion ratio and shorter growing cycle. In this context, the purpose of this study was to conduct a Life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental performance of Black soldier fly meal (BSFM) and to assess the sustainability potential of the use of BSFM as a feed input in Canadian egg production. Using a BSF commercial producer as a case study, the goal was to identify and evaluate opportunities to improve the environmental performance of the BFS products, as well as their potential to mitigate the environmental impacts of egg production when used in poultry feed. Different scenarios were evaluated based on varying scales of production, alternative technologies, and energy sources, as well as use of alternative substrates for larvae rearing. This study also highlights the importance of properly differentiating the agri-food co-products and wastes that are used as substrates in other food supply chains or in waste valorization contexts, such as for insect production. In support of improved consistency, a decision tree was formulated to guide LCA practitioners on how to model and allocate these materials based on the ISO 14044 definitions and allocation requirements. The overall results of the LCA showed that producing BSFM at an industrial scale could have important environmental benefits and trade-offs for the Canadian egg industry, depending primarily on the composition of the insect diet and the use of the co-products from BSF production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.545
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it