MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE EDIACARAN FROND CHARNIODISCUS FROM THE MISTAKEN POINT FORMATION, NEWFOUNDLAND
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Charniodiscus is a leaf-shaped Ediacaran (terminal Neoproterozoic) fossil with a worldwide distribution, but the scarcity of complete specimens has previously hindered evaluation of its taxonomy and ecology. The presence of hundreds of complete (fronds with stem and disc attached) Charniodiscus specimens from the Avalon Zone of Newfoundland has allowed for detailed morphometric analysis of Charniodiscus specimens and permits determination of characteristics which vary with growth (e.g., stem length, frond width, and disc diameter) versus those that reflect taxonomic differences (e.g., number of primary segments, presence of a distal spine, shape ratios). This has led to the recognition of three species of Charniodiscus in the Mistaken Point biota, including numerous specimens of two new taxa, C. procerus n. sp. and C. spinosus n. sp., and rare specimens of the Australian species C. arboreus. C. procerus n. sp. and C. spinosus n. sp. represent similar, yet ecologically distinct forms of upper-level filter feeders with diverging feeding strategies in order to reduce the competition for resources. Ratio plots and principal components analyses (PCAs) confirm the existence of five (possibly six) morphologically distinct species of Charniodiscus worldwide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".